Saturday, September 19, 2009

Fanaticism - or Fans - at their Best

Last Wednesday, around two hours before heading off to see the Inter vs. Barcelona game, I was speaking to a friend of mine (ahem, before she rudely abandoned me in mid-conversation!) who asked me if I was going to the Red Carpet Event later on that evening. I promptly replied that I had opted to see the match instead and while she seemed to be a bit disappointed that I was going to watch football instead of spending a night out with friends, she then pondered why it is fine for someone to be a football fanatic and not fine for them to be a God fanatic. This got me thinking a bit.

First, however, before moving onto my arguments, I would like to set the record straight slightly. This argument, I believe, was not intended for me but was very much a generalisation. I believe that in such scenarios, we have to distinguish fully between events that are completely intended for God, such as Youth Meetings and the Mass, and social events that are designed to spend time amongst your friends, even if the majority of these form part of a community. In the case presented here, we are clearly speaking about the latter. It is clearly wrong and irresponsible, especially if you are building up a relationship with God, to abandon Him to watch a football match or do some sort of social activity that would overlap one's participation in getting closer to Him. It goes against the grain of making God the centre-focus of one's life; by doing something such as the above, one is simply placing materialistic items before God. Furthermore, to also close a point that has been lingering on for quite a while, not going a community-based social event does not mean that you are choosing other things, such as football, over Jesus. While the latter point was not a problem with my friend, who didn't even bring this argument up, I have heard it one too many times from certain people in the past to not mention it; so doing so now will indefinitely clear things up.

Having said that (and that indeed was an argument in itself, and probably part of my argument too for that matter), I will tackle the argument of fanaticism. For a start, I'm not of the school of thought that fanaticism, is positive. Fanaticism shows that something is needed in excess; you cannot live without this something in life; it leads you to do things that you might not even want to do. Of course, there is something that we cannot live without in life, and that thing is God. Actually, the word 'thing', I believe, is incorrectly used - I'd rather use the term 'entity' instead. Anyway, some people, in all fairness, opt to do so and survive accordingly, but as practicing Christians, we cannot live without God at any moment in our lives because otherwise our lives will be empty and void. Our lives, in a nutshell, would not be worth living at any moment, any time, and any day. Hence, by elimination, we can say that being a football fanatic is something that is not even a tenth as critical as being a fan of God*. Indeed, nothing is as critical as that.

Therefore, why do we seem to be fine with being football fanatics and not fine with being fans of God? It ultimately boils down to the same issue as always - God seems to be a taboo among people in general, and when people openly admit that they are Christians and that they love living in the Christian way because they really do experience God fully, then they get condemned, criticised and often emarginated for it. Placing football ahead of God is ultimately that that I mentioned earlier - giving an increased level of importance to something materialistic as opposed to giving that increased level of importance to Him. It seems as if for the most part, the general societal perception is that God is not 'cool' enough for such people, and hence society finds it easy to take the mickey out of the segment of society that really does make an effort to be better Christians and incorporate Him more in their lives. While this isn't right, it's unfortunately reality - and as we all know, reality is something that we have to live with.

We, as Christians, must try to change this perception as much as we can; but while it isn't impossible (as nothing is impossible for God), we have to acknowledge fully that we have a major battle on our hands to do so.

God Bless You all!
Matti

*Following an important distinction between 'fanaticism' and 'fan', it is important to realise that I have been referring to the latter all throughout. The context has been edited to reflect this.

16 comments:

Unknown said...

bedsliesa point of clarification when you mention christians do you include the infamous church of christ which created the schism between christianity and the church of christ?

Lanfy said...

I dont agree with the term God fanatic mat. fanaticism is wrong in any situation. If one is a God fanatic he/she isnt serious about his relationship i think. I stand to be corrected but i think its one thing beiong a God FAN and another being a FANATIC.

With reference to such community events. It's not a question of choosing one thing over another. it has nothing to do with it. I just see it right and just to support the community where you get all your spiritual nourishment and spend most of your time especially since most events are fund raising. On the contrary you can't force anyone to go anywhere where he/she doesnt want but neither can we expect to recieve from a community and give nothign back :)

Gianluca said...

Good story .. what made you thinking, made me thinking ... and I do really think we should be fans of God

Gian :P

Matti said...

Gonna take comments one by one.

@Lanfranco

Re: Fanaticism; the blog has been edited to reflect this notion following an important distinction between 'fanaticism' and 'fan'. It is evident and important to realise that it was the latter that I was referring to throughout, even though the former was initially typed. Hence, that is my mistake and I apologise for that.

My entire point of reference was the fact of managing to build up a relationship with God that is really strong to the extent that no matter wat adversaries are faced, nothing will break the relationship that you have with Him. :)

Re: Events; Of course they cannot be imposed on people, it would be wrong to do so. However, my point behind this is because someone doesn't attend one event (as in my case), they cannot be (loosely) criticised for it. After all, it's up to them to choose what they want to do, as you said. In my case, I really do make an effort to attend everything organised and even do football tournaments so that Y4J has further fundraiser events, as I do believe in supporting the Community. Hence, I see any criticism that has been levied in my direction, in this regard, to be a tad unfair.

Matti said...

@Alex

Your comment is irrelevant in the context of the blog. We're not talking about Christian denominations, or potential Christian denominations, or denominations that are not Christian.

@Gianluca

Thanks :)

Unknown said...

its just a point of clarification... im not discussing the relevance of your text...

Emanuel said...

the way you speak about God makes me wonder whether you really distinguish between Him and Santa Claus..

Matti said...

@'Emanuel'

Can you kindly refrain from leaving your trash on this blog unless you're going to comment constructively

Shpow said...

Emanuel, (do you come from Louisiana? Just saying, you're using one 'm' after all) the way you type make me wonder whether you dropped out of middle school or not. Wahey.

Emanuel said...

Here's your constructive comment:

Antonio:
"Mark you this Bassanio,
The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose,
An evil soul producing holy witness
Is like a villian with a smiling cheek,
A goodly apple rotten at the heart.
O what a goodly outside falsehood hath!"

The Merchant of Venice (I, iii, 93-98)

Matti said...

@ Emanuel

That's about as constructive as wrecking a car. With you being involved in the wreck.

Emanuel said...

If you can't grasp the essence of Shakespeare, God only knows (pardon the pun) how you can grasp that of the Bible.

Good luck for your quest in converting the world.

Matti said...

@Emanuel

"If you can't grasp the essence of Shakespeare, God only knows (pardon the pun) how you can grasp that of the Bible."

If only you knew.

Indeed, it is true that 'The Devil can cite scripture for his purpose'... This is even found in the Bible. For in Luke, and to be a bit more specific, the climactic temptations, the devil quotes the Book of Psalms (Psalm 91:11-12) to test Jesus:

And he took him to Jerusalem and set him on the pinnacle of the temple and said to him, “If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down from here, for it is written, “‘He will command his angels concerning you, to guard you,’ and “‘On their hands they will bear you up, lest you strike your foot against a stone.’” (Luke 4:9-11)

Now by means of sheer common sense, you have to agree with me that the Bible came before Shakespeare's works did. Hence I think what you said - that if I can't grasp the essence of Shakespeare "God only knows" how I'll grasp the essence of the Bible - is completely wrong. It's totally the opposite!

Also, so that you know, people like us Christians are worthless. Seriously. We are worthless without God. That is why we need God and that is why God uses the weak to do His work.

“God in His mercy has given us this work to do so we do not become discouraged. It is not
ourselves that we preach. We preach Jesus Christ as Lord and ourselves as your servants for Jesus’ sake. Yet we who have this spiritual treasure are like common clay pots in order to show the supreme power belongs to God not to us. We are often troubled but we are not crushed, sometimes
in doubt but never in despair. There are many enemies but we’re never without a friend and though badly hurt at times, we’re not destroyed. At all times we carry in our mortal bodies the death of
Jesus so that His life may be seen in our bodies. All of this is for your sake. As God’s grace reaches more and more people they will offer to the glory of God more prayers of thanksgiving.” (2 Corinthians 4)

Matti said...

@Emanuel

Furthermore, just to point out, although I'm almost certain that a person with your level of intelligence would know this already... Isn't it ironic that you're signing under that name?

Shpow said...

Don't feed the trolls, Matt.

Emanuel said...

I'm glad my provocation served to spill out the sense you're capable of. Over-inflated rhethoric without substance is as effective as the indoctrinating priests you crusade against.

RE: Shakespeare, he was refering to religious hypocrisy.

RE: Emanuel..lol